- Subscribe
- Log In More
Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in using your username and password
- Basket
- Search More
Advanced search
- Latest content
- Current issue
- Archive
- Authors
- About
- Podcasts
Advanced search
- CloseMore
Main menu
- Latest content
- Current issue
- Archive
- Authors
- About
- Podcasts
- Subscribe
- Log in More
Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in using your username and password
- BMJ Journals
You are here
- Home
- Archive
- Volume 83,Issue Suppl 1
- POS1018 THE PREDICTIVE ROLE OF HISTOLOGICAL FINDINGS IN REPEATED KIDNEY BIOPSIES IN LUPUS NEPHRITIS PATIENTS WITH LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP
Email alerts
Article Text
Article menu
- Article Text
- Article info
- Citation Tools
- Share
- Rapid Responses
- Article metrics
- Alerts
Scientific Abstracts
Poster View
Systemic lupus erythematosus
POS1018 THE PREDICTIVE ROLE OF HISTOLOGICAL FINDINGS IN REPEATED KIDNEY BIOPSIES IN LUPUS NEPHRITIS PATIENTS WITH LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP
Abstract
Background: The therapeutic goal in LN is to avoid organ damage while preserving renal function. While kidney biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnostic/prognostic assessment in LN, the use of multiple biopsies during follow-up to assess disease activity is performed only in specialized centers, and the data regarding patients with LN and multiple renal biopsies is still scarce.
Objectives: We aimed to evaluate if AI and CI in patients with repeated biopsies could predict renal outcomes in a selected cohort of patients suffering from LN and a long-term follow-up.
Methods: We recruited 20 LN patients who underwent at least two renal biopsies, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Histological, serological and urinary samples were collected. Histological samples were analyzed in order to calculate AI and CI according to the modified NIH indices.
Results: The main characteristics of the cohort are the following: females = 13/20 (65%); age at LN diagnosis = 32.15 ± 11.74; years of follow-up = 14.7 ± 9; patients who underwent two biopsies = 11/20 (55%); patients who underwent three biopsies = 9/20 (45%)(Table 1).
We observed that patients showing contraction of the renal function as measured by CKD class ≥3 at the time of the first biopsy showed significantly lower levels of complement, both C3 and C4 (100% CKD ≥3 versus 50% CKD < 3, p<0.05), and higher CI at the subsequent biopsies (5.2 ± 0.9 CKD ≥3 versus 3.6 ± 1 CKD < 3 at 2nd biopsy, p <0.05; 6.3 ± 2 CKD ≥3 versus 3.6 ± 0.9 CKD < 3 at 3rd biopsy).
The same was observed with respect to patients that developed ESRD at follow-up, again showing significantly lower levels of complement, both C3 and C4 (100% ESRD versus 50% no ESRD, p<0.05), and higher CI at the subsequent biopsies (5.5 ± 1 ESRD versus 3.7 ± 1 no ESRD at 2nd biopsy, p<0.05; 7 ± 1.7 ESRD versus 3.7 ± 0.8 no ESRD at 3rd biopsy, p<0.05),
In addition, when specifically focusing on AI and CI, we observed that a CI ≥4 at first biopsy and a CI ≥5 at second biopsy were associated to a decline of the renal function during the follow-up, assessed by eGFR and CKD class ≥3 (eGFR and CI 1st biopsy ≥4, Log Rank test p<0.05, eGFR and CI 2nd biopsy ≥5, Log Rank test p<0.05, CKD class ≥3 and CI 1st biopsy ≥4, Log Rank test p<0.05, CKD class ≥3 and CI 2nd biopsy ≥5, Log Rank test p<0.05), but also to a higher risk of developing ESRD (ESRD and CI 1st biopsy ≥4, Log Rank test p<0.001, ESRD and CI 2nd biopsy ≥5, Log Rank test p<0.001)(Figure 1).
When focusing on patients’ management, we observed a statistically significant difference in patients who were treated with the intensified B-lymphocyte depletion protocol between the first and the second biopsy, with respect to a CI ≥3 (100% no intensified protocol versus 24% intensified protocol, p<0.001), ≥4 (80% no intensified protocol versus 14% intensified protocol, p<0.05) and ≥5 (43% no intensified protocol versus 0% intensified protocol, p<0.05) at the second biopsy, with patients not undertaking the therapy showing higher CI.
Conclusion: A chronicity index ≥4 at first biopsy and a ≥5 at second biopsy seems to be associated to a decline of the renal function in LN patients (assessed by eGFR and CKD class ≥3) and to a higher risk of developing ESRD. Moreover, complement consumption (C3 and C4) at diagnosis seems to be associated to a more enhanced sclerotic process and a more pronounced deterioration of the renal function as well. Histological findings in repeated kidney biopsies might predict patients with worse renal outcomes.
Table 1. Summary of the main characteristics of the cohort.
- Download figure
- Open in new tab
- Download powerpoint
- Download figure
- Open in new tab
- Download powerpoint
Figure 1.
Graphs representing the Kaplan Meier results. A. Survival curve with a normal eGFR, according to a CI cut-off of 4 at first biopsy. B. Survival curve with a normal eGFR, according to a CI cut-off of 5 at second biopsy. C. Survival curve with first stage CKD, according to a CI cut-off of 4 at first biopsy. D. Survival curve with first stage CKD, according to a CI cut-off of 5 at second biopsy. E. Survival curve without ESRD, according to a CI cut-off of 4 at first biopsy. F. Survival curve without ESRD, according to a CI cut-off of 5 at second biopsy.
REFERENCES: NIL.
Acknowledgements: NIL.
Disclosure of Interests: None declared.
- Real-world evidence
- Prognostic factors
- Biomarkers
- Kidneys
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
- Real-world evidence
- Prognostic factors
- Biomarkers
- Kidneys
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Subscribe
Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in using your username and password
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Subscribe
Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens